Tuesday, May 21, 2013

selena gomez on ellen 2010

selena gomez on ellen 2010. %IMG_DESC_1%
  • %IMG_DESC_1%



  • Clive At Five
    Nov 28, 02:15 PM
    Because they fear the iPod... and its ecosystem...

    This is key for sure. The success of the iPod is directly attributed to its integrated "ecosystem" as you put it. iTS, iTunes, iPod.

    Slowly but surely, with movies, photos and games - and MUCH talk of cell phone syncing with iCal, Address Book and iApps - Apple is attempting to tie iLife & OS X into the equation... making it a critical and integral part of that ecosystem.

    If people wanted the full iPod experience, they NEEDED iTunes... so they adopted it. In the future, with product XYZ, people will NEED OS X for the full experience... and they will adopt it.

    THAT is what MS fears about Apple/iPod. They could give a rat's ass about the portable music/media market. They just want desperately to kill the iPod and what it means for MS's future.

    In my opinion, they should've undersold by $50+/unit. At their current rate, they'll never penetrate the market.

    -Clive





    selena gomez on ellen 2010. %IMG_DESC_2%
  • %IMG_DESC_2%



  • Slix
    Apr 3, 09:03 AM
    I liked this ad. Very nice.





    selena gomez on ellen 2010. %IMG_DESC_3%
  • %IMG_DESC_3%



  • kiljoy616
    Mar 26, 01:43 AM
    That just blows my mind!:)

    That is one impressive tablet so much power and so thing. That would mean that the camera makes even less sense now considering the gpu and cpu capacity.





    selena gomez on ellen 2010. %IMG_DESC_4%
  • %IMG_DESC_4%



  • Lollypop
    Jul 20, 03:33 AM
    Gah. The Linux community doesn't want to unify. In fact, not unifying is the core of their philosophy. The vast majority of Linux users (ie, non-n00bs) don't really give a crap about mass adoption of Linux. Many even view such a possibility with horror and disgust. The only priority is choice. It's why there are 415 distributions (none of which are compatible with each other), 9,843 window managers (none of which have remotely similar configuration options), and 3.43x10^15 terminal emulators (none of which actually emulate terminals any better or worse than any other one).

    Waving the "king of the OS hill" prize in front of a bunch of Linux users/developers will only result in them staring at you like a dog that's been shown a card trick. With very few exceptions, only n00bs (and uncomprehending businessmen who think they can somehow profit) want mass adoption of Linux.

    This is a very true statement! With all the different features of the different distributions there will never be a singular Linux out there. People dont want to download the source and compile it, even the best package managers dont really solve the problem, I want to download any application and run it, I dont want to have something check dependancies and then get teh appropriate version ect. The newest Suse enterprise desktop has a lot of Mac os like features, and claim to have done a lot of research into user interface optomization ect, but thats only Suse, what about the rest, Linux will never have a singular unified front, and that is its achilees heel, and the macs inherant strenght (ok so the mac isnt that unified anymore)

    I hope apple continues the trends they showed this quater, more and more people need to exposed to the mac, and more and more people will switch.





    selena gomez on ellen 2010. %IMG_DESC_5%
  • %IMG_DESC_5%



  • DMann
    Aug 6, 08:43 PM
    http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif (http://www.macrumors.com)

    MacRumorsLive.com (http://www.macrumorslive.com/) will provide live coverage of the event starting at 1PM EST (10AM Pacific). No need to reload the page, updates will appear as they are posted. In January, our system successfully delivered updates to over 100,000 (http://www.macrumors.com/events/mwsf2006-stats.php) simultaneous visitors.

    More photos of banners posted at WWDC have been circulating. Apple appears to be taking on Microsoft's upcoming Vista operating system directly with banners that state:

    "Mac OS X Leopard, Introducing Vista 2.0" (photo (http://static.flickr.com/74/207241438_7c0f89412d_b.jpg))
    "Mac OS X Leopard, Hasta la Vista, Vista"

    In the meanwhile, you can read the WWDC 2006 Rumor Roundup (http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2006/08/20060805162310.shtml), see our WWDC related Guide Pages (http://guides.macrumors.com/Category:WWDC_2006), chat in our IRC channel (http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2003/06/20030608214842.shtml) or participate in the forums (http://forums.macrumors.com).

    We will continue to provide any last minute updates leading to the event.

    Perhaps MS will change the name a third time before it is released.





    selena gomez on ellen 2010. %IMG_DESC_6%
  • %IMG_DESC_6%



  • Dr.Gargoyle
    Aug 29, 11:31 AM
    My dream mini has a HD-DVD player, HDMI/DVI out, optical audio out (mainly important for those that want to connect to a surround sound receiver) and add some Netflix-like movie download subscription service added to iTunes. Put those together with space for a 3.5" hard drive and run Front Row 2.0 and I'd be psyched.

    I really want the Mac Mini to be a basic TV hub device. It doesn't have to have a DVR, cable card slots or TV tuners built-in. Sure, if Apple could build an all-in-one box that's better than my HR10-250 (HD Tivo for DirecTV) or the upcoming Series 3 from Tivo that would be great. But for now I'd be happy with one box for TV watching (HR10-250) and one box for everything else (DVDs, music, movie downloading, casual web surfing).
    I would like to see a "media center" with a basic built-in TV-tuner so I could use it as a TIVO. It cant be that hard to add a TV-tuner...





    selena gomez on ellen 2010. %IMG_DESC_7%
  • %IMG_DESC_7%



  • mrmicp
    Apr 3, 04:48 AM
    The advert speaks volumes to me, I love it..... a select few won't, but it's just not possible to please 100% of the people 100% of the time.





    selena gomez on ellen 2010. %IMG_DESC_8%
  • %IMG_DESC_8%



  • lpmusix
    Oct 24, 01:40 AM
    Wednesday makes a lot more sense.
    Why would Wenesday make more sense?





    selena gomez on ellen 2010. %IMG_DESC_9%
  • %IMG_DESC_9%



  • Tonsko
    Jan 6, 05:36 PM
    Heh. I used to use 98/99 until about a year ago. Fuel is just too expensive now. I know my golf's ECU adjusts the timing automatically depending on what octane level the fuel is. It shouldn't really matter.





    selena gomez on ellen 2010. %IMG_DESC_10%
  • %IMG_DESC_10%



  • NewSc2
    Nov 29, 04:49 PM
    New features? I can see it now...

    Nike+iTV. Track your calories, heart rate, and more, while watching TV.





    selena gomez on ellen 2010. %IMG_DESC_11%
  • %IMG_DESC_11%



  • MacFan782040
    Nov 27, 03:28 PM
    Well think about it...all Apple's consumer products have iSights built in for "video-confrencing out of the box". If they want to push the MacMini, they will need a low-end display with a built-in iSight for this.

    Sell it seperately at $249.

    Maybe bundle a MacMini/display together?

    MacMini- $599
    bundled display- $200

    $799 for a computer/display + mouse/keyboard

    ...your talking less than $900 for a full Apple system-not bad!

    *And for everyone saying 17" is too small... Think of all the people who bought MacBooks at 13.3"! Nobody I know that has one uses an external display.





    selena gomez on ellen 2010. %IMG_DESC_12%
  • %IMG_DESC_12%



  • freeny
    Jul 19, 04:37 PM
    stocks up 7.45% in after hours.....:)





    selena gomez on ellen 2010. %IMG_DESC_13%
  • %IMG_DESC_13%



  • vastoholic
    Feb 21, 06:55 PM
    text
    nice to see another Sigur Ros fan here. Very nice pics and great set up too.





    selena gomez on ellen 2010. %IMG_DESC_14%
  • %IMG_DESC_14%



  • Krafty
    Nov 26, 09:28 PM
    http://lulzimg.com/i9/39dde9c5.jpg

    Jr. Bacon Cheeseburger + 1/4lb Baconator = First meal of the day
    Wendys, you had me at bacon.





    selena gomez on ellen 2010. %IMG_DESC_15%
  • %IMG_DESC_15%



  • Jack97
    Apr 3, 04:13 AM
    Did anyone else thing that was a really bad advert? They hardly showed the product fully at all!





    selena gomez on ellen 2010. %IMG_DESC_16%
  • %IMG_DESC_16%



  • sluthy
    Jan 2, 06:35 PM
    Did that not just happen ... :cool:

    Likely:
    Speed bump to one or more Mac lines
    ...

    Less likely:
    ....
    Major upgrade to Mac mini (video card upgrade) or MacBook Pro
    New Displays
    ...

    Unlikely:
    ...
    Major upgrade to any line other than mini or MBP
    ...

    :( How long ago were the MBPs updated? Because I'm looking to buy Jan/Feb and I'm not confident that the current spec is competitive. It at least needs a HD screen.





    selena gomez on ellen 2010. %IMG_DESC_17%
  • %IMG_DESC_17%



  • jav6454
    Mar 24, 10:27 PM
    Ehhh...you're right that it's no 1200watt corsair. But it supports dual CPUs, crap ton of ram, and 5770x2 or 5870...surely it could support a 6970(from a tdp perspective)

    Nop... consider.

    2x CPUs 130W rated. So thats 260W, right there. However, no CPU consumes the rated, so it's give or take ~260W.

    Each 5770 is ~108W, given two, that's ~216 W. Right off the bat we have ~476 W being consumed. Not bad; however let's look at the side where its not a dual 5770 setup.

    The PSU on the Mac Pro is rated for 980 W of power, but for simplicity sake let's say 1 kW. Now, factor in the Super drive, Ethernet, Airport, at least 1 HDD and peripheral docks/cards you are looking at ~100 W. Take into account a 20 W per 1GB of memory (assume 6GB) and you've got ~120 W more. So far ~ 220 W more.

    Now we have ~480 W [~260W + ~220W]consumption leaving only ~520 W left for a GPU. Currently, the HD 6970 requires 2x 8-pin connectors to provide 150 W per pin. That's 300W right off. So we are left with ~220 W in the system. Now, factor in that PCIe slot power draw at 75 W and we've got a ~145 W left over. ~145 W is cutting it too close and something will yield (yes I do realize 145 W is a lot more, but read on). Now, the sad part, we were assuming 1kW PSU which is not the case; it's 980 W meaning there will be less power, ~125 W. Now, also take into consideration no PSU is 100% efficient, hence there will be greater power outlet draw and the PSU will be operating at high voltage/amps and its life span will decrease dramatically over very high usage.

    In other words the current PSU may come up short. Add to that the fact that all current shipping and past model Mac Pros don't have extra dual 8-pin connectors. They have dual 6-pins. There is an adapter to make a 6-pin into an 8-pin, but it is risky at best, big no-no.

    So as you can see an HD 6970 would be barely supported on current models. Future models? Perhaps yes assuming Apple bumps to 1.1kW or 1.2kW PSU.

    Take into account this was calculated assuming 6GB of memory and 1 HDD, anymore RAM (20 W/1GB) or HDDs (10W/disc) and the consumption will go up. Also, assuming nothing is hooked up to peripheral ports; like a small external drive that draws 5-10 W.





    selena gomez on ellen 2010. %IMG_DESC_18%
  • %IMG_DESC_18%



  • carmenodie
    Apr 3, 12:04 AM
    Marketing geniuses :)
    You got that right.
    People also forget that Apple is, at its core, an engineering company.
    I can't wait to get my ipad 2 64 gig only . I'll get the wifi because I ain't paying no body for tethering and I'm too chicken to jailbreak my iphone 4.





    selena gomez on ellen 2010. %IMG_DESC_19%
  • %IMG_DESC_19%



  • BenRoethig
    Aug 29, 11:45 AM
    I would like to see a "media center" with a basic built-in TV-tuner so I could use it as a TIVO. It cant be that hard to add a TV-tuner...

    I'm thinking something similar. 3.5x8.5x8.5. Basically a larger MacMini with a 3.5" hard drive, dedicated graphics, and video chipset similar to the Miglia TV Max.





    SaMaster14
    Jan 11, 10:44 PM
    I was intending on getting a 335i coupe and decided to take the 135i for a spin for kicks (it was the year they came out). While they run about the same speed, the 135i just felt quicker. I ended up with the 135i vert ( pic in old thread). I have had two 3 series before, so this was just a change of pace.

    For those that think it is too tall, keep in mind that it gives it a much roomier feel inside. I am 6'4 and I could not fit in a miata sized car. When I get in a 3 series, even it feels less roomy in the cockpit.

    I also like the fact that the 1series is much more rare, around here anyway, than the 3. I still love the 3, though.

    Both the 1 series and the 3 series are really common where I live (Los Angeles, CA). I'm not a big guy, so the inside of a car being small has never bothered me at all. Personally, I didn't get the 335i coupe because my parents didn't want me have a coupe for a first car, and the G37S sedan was nicer looking, $10,000 less and about 95% of what the 3 series would give me. (plus, since I'm obviously not going to keep my first car for that long, I wanted something to look forward to when I upgrade... hopefully a 335iS coupe or something along that price range).





    Northgrove
    May 3, 05:40 AM
    In Lion a user simply needs to invoke the Launchpad, click and hold on the icon of the application they wish to delete, and when the icons begin to wiggle a cross appears on icons of apps installed via the Mac App Store. Clicking this cross brings up the message "Are you sure you want to delete the application...?", and clicking 'Delete' confirms and removes the app.
    I hope I can right-click and delete them too. Pointless to click and wait while holding if you have an input device with more than one button... :rolleyes:





    jettredmont
    Apr 12, 09:52 PM
    Who thinks that they'll eliminate Final Cut Express and lower the price of Final Cut Pro? iMovie seems to serve the "express crowd" while FCP would be within reach of the semi-pro demographic if the price were around $300.

    That would be a good move, but I'm not convinced Apple would do it. I think it's fairly likely that Final Cut Express goes away, perhaps replaced with mid-priced Final Cut components (ie, pieces of the Final Cut Studio package).

    Should know soon enough though (at least on FCP pricing structure; FCE has always lagged behind FCP since it first came out).





    jp102235
    Mar 25, 04:08 PM
    There's still the practical limitations of using a touchscreen as a control device, though. It's never going to be as tactile as a controller with buttons and joysticks. Not to mention having the HDMI adaptor sticking out of the side of the iPad while you're holding it to play games...

    Apart from that, I'm glad to see the iPad is able to hold its own as a gaming machine.

    amazing, especially if you can build a steering wheel receptacle that holds the ipad, and converts the hdmi out to a wireless signal (an hdmi to ATSC would be a perfect soln... hmmm... I'll need an analog design engineer to help me out though...)

    like this:
    http://www.ismashphone.com/2009/08/where-the-rubber-meets-the-road-iphone-accessories.html
    http://www.ismashphone.com/2010/02/its-the-wheel-thing-ipad-steeringwheel-controller-in-the-offing.html





    MacFever
    Apr 19, 11:49 AM
    Apple will be pushing out Thunderbolt for sure....

    I wonder when the cinema displays will get the thunderbolt port for daisychaining ?

    Macbook Air with the iMac?

    I think Professionals will be waiting to upgrade to hardware unless it thunderbolt ready like the MBP....huge advantage for Pro use with thunderbolt as opposed to current firewire 800.