Wednesday, May 15, 2013

harry potter 7 part 1 cover

harry potter 7 part 1 cover. harry potter and the deathly
  • harry potter and the deathly



  • prady16
    Oct 12, 01:33 PM
    Check out DeaPeaJay's mockup at AppleInsider. Me want.
    http://www.exit42design.com/stuffDirectory/redNano.jpg
    Looks good!





    harry potter 7 part 1 cover. Harry Potter And The Deathly
  • Harry Potter And The Deathly



  • Hattig
    Mar 29, 12:40 PM
    using the keyboard, how quaint

    Far faster than using the mouse. Mac OS X is very good at providing keyboard shortcuts, far better than Windows, although that may have changed with Windows 7.

    I don't even get the point of your snarky comment. You know damn well that the functions are also available via the menus and right mouse button too.





    harry potter 7 part 1 cover. Harry Potter and the Deathly
  • Harry Potter and the Deathly



  • Henri Gaudier
    Oct 28, 03:45 AM
    ..Green Peace. Is this another manifestation of "End Time" thinking? Unbelievable. From what does it stem from?

    What can be offensive about being "green"?

    There's exploitation, war and hate mongering everywhere you look and you come to a Mac community forum and you find out you hate your neighbours. Neo-liberal capitalist scum. Amazing. Mightilly pissed off with a lot of you.





    harry potter 7 part 1 cover. harry potter and the deathly
  • harry potter and the deathly



  • MattDell
    Sep 3, 07:22 PM
    This may be a really dumb question, but when the new MBP comes out, do y'all think it'll stay aroudn the same price range or increase?:confused:
    Typically you get an upgrade and no price change. Sometimes the price even goes down.

    -Matt





    harry potter 7 part 1 cover. Harry Potter 7 1
  • Harry Potter 7 1



  • AidenShaw
    Mar 22, 02:38 PM
    I want to know where to get a list of products that hook onto Thunderbolt.

    Rocketman

    From terminal, to see all the shipping Thunderbolt products use the command

    cat /dev/null


    http://www.lacie.com/us/index.htm

    Coming summer 2011 - at least 3 months away.





    harry potter 7 part 1 cover. This year, Harry Potter and
  • This year, Harry Potter and



  • TonySwartz
    Oct 12, 04:35 PM
    http://img189.imageshack.us/img189/5216/indexfallingnanos20061012fz5.th.png (http://img189.imageshack.us/my.php?image=indexfallingnanos20061012fz5.png)





    harry potter 7 part 1 cover. Picture 129 Harry Potter and
  • Picture 129 Harry Potter and



  • Misplaced Mage
    Sep 26, 05:29 PM
    Mark me down in the "it's on Cingular because it's HSDPA" camp. If Apple seriously intends to sell songs (and TV shows? movies? games?) from the iTunes Store over the air, they need two things:




    harry potter 7 part 1 cover. harry potter and the deathly
  • harry potter and the deathly



  • scoobydoo99
    Apr 20, 02:09 PM
    You have no proof of this.


    I'm sure they do... but for the most part they just subpoena the telecom provider for whatever records they require.

    lol. they don't even have to subpoena these days. just ask nicely and the companies simply hand over anything they want (all in the name of being good patriots.) Of course, sometimes they charge the government for it:
    http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-05-10-nsa_x.htm





    harry potter 7 part 1 cover. 2 parts of Harry Potter
  • 2 parts of Harry Potter



  • MacSamurai
    Sep 5, 01:27 PM
    OH PLEEASE let it be the phone...i need a new one now!!!





    harry potter 7 part 1 cover. Front cover; Harry Potter and
  • Front cover; Harry Potter and



  • Freyqq
    Apr 25, 05:57 PM
    I hope they make the anti-glare screen standard, or at least the same price as the uber glossy one.





    harry potter 7 part 1 cover. Part 1 begins as Harry,
  • Part 1 begins as Harry,



  • Mac Fly (film)
    Sep 14, 10:03 PM
    one of the best predictions i have heard to date...
    Why thank you!





    harry potter 7 part 1 cover. harry potter and the deathly
  • harry potter and the deathly



  • manu chao
    Apr 11, 07:46 AM
    I got my Mac connected to some great speakers.
    Now, a friend comes by for a visit, brings along his laptop and we want to hear some music from his iTunes --> messy cables, my friend standing with his laptop by the amplifier because that cable is short (…)

    Ever heard of Home Sharing? If you read carefully through this thread, you might even come across it. As long as you connect your friend's laptop to your WiFi network, you access its iTunes library through Home Sharing from your Mac.


    Another friend comes over. We want to listen to music from his/her iPod/iPhone/iPad --> messy cables.

    Simply connect his or her iOS device or iPod to your computer with the standard sync cable (keeps it charged at the same time), and you can access its content from your Mac.

    All this could be accomplished with a few airport express units across the house which is somehow a luxury option money-wise and somehow redundant since I already have a wireless router and at least one computer up and running.
    So, Airport Expresses are luxury but other WiFi routers onto which an Airplay hack could be installed are not luxury?
    You can rightfully slam Apple for not including Airplay into the Time Capsule and Airport Extreme but that is about it.

    And for those suggesting third-party software, this sounds great if I were the only using them. I cannot imagine telling my friends "hey, buy this $40 software so we can stream music to each other's computer". I'm not sure I could even convince them to install free software to mess with their audio setup.

    To stream between computers, you only need iTunes and Home Sharing, which is, btw, free. And you now welcome/wish for a third-party hack to stream music and then in the same breath say that installing even bonafide software like the free Airfoil Speakers or iTunes is out of the question. What is it, you could convince your friends to install a third-party hack on their computers but not iTunes or Airfoil?





    harry potter 7 part 1 cover. This is a Re-Release of Harry
  • This is a Re-Release of Harry



  • MacinDoc
    Sep 14, 12:57 PM
    new here to the forums.

    i've been patiently waiting for the MBP to be updated before i ordered but wanted to jump on the iPod deal as well which ends the 16th

    if one was to place an order and then these are announced the following week, would Apple upgrade you to the comparable machine?
    If the new one is announced before your order ships, it will be automatically upgraded. Otherwise, you should return the unopened product within 2 weeks of purchase for a free upgrade.





    harry potter 7 part 1 cover. Harry+potter+7+part+1
  • Harry+potter+7+part+1



  • ezekielrage_99
    Aug 23, 10:25 PM
    Still got to love the fact that Dell wouldn't do anything for the consumers without tha dang video hitting the net.

    Got to love customer relations :cool:





    harry potter 7 part 1 cover. part 1 cover. Harry Potter
  • part 1 cover. Harry Potter



  • Apple Shmapple
    Sep 12, 04:59 PM
    At these new lower price points that reads pretty UN-educated to me.

    Whoopidedoo, a whole $50 off. They HAD to do that because of the lack of actually updating anything worthy on the device. One could argue that it isn't enough of a price cut the way competitors music players are priced.

    Anyone with half a brain will avoid these 5th G Part 2 devices like the plague, unless they want to waste money that could be spent 4 months later on a widescreen model.

    Should we set up the thread now for the people that rush out and buy this version of the iPod then get burned just after Christmas when the real new iPod comes out? They'll need someplace to vent, and it's usually all over these threads. It would be nice to condense it.





    harry potter 7 part 1 cover. Runner Up: Harry Potter and
  • Runner Up: Harry Potter and



  • spicyapple
    Sep 10, 06:36 AM
    The Woodcrest MacPro will suddenly feel very old if Apple manage to put Cloverton in MacPro early next year.
    It appears I will be living in a cardboard box under a bridge sooner than I expected. :) All these juicy new Apples will put me in the poor house!





    harry potter 7 part 1 cover. Harry+potter+7+dvd+cover; harry potter and the deathly hallows part 1 dvd cover. hallows part 1 movie cover; hallows part 1 movie cover
  • Harry+potter+7+dvd+cover; harry potter and the deathly hallows part 1 dvd cover. hallows part 1 movie cover; hallows part 1 movie cover



  • langis.elbasunu
    Mar 23, 06:25 PM
    in the us you are a criminal by default





    harry potter 7 part 1 cover. The Harry Potter and the
  • The Harry Potter and the



  • SuperCachetes
    Apr 25, 06:24 AM
    The simple fact is that I should not have to obey a 70mph speed limit if I don't want to. Why would I even bother driving a car that can hit 186mph (with the speed governor removed, with the governor top speed is 155mph) at 70 mph? A Ford Fiesta can hit those speeds, what's the point of fast cars if you're going to follow the speed limit in them?

    :rolleyes:

    http://www.overstockdrugstore.com/product_images/w/041608087406.jpg





    harry potter 7 part 1 cover. Harry Potter fans out there,
  • Harry Potter fans out there,



  • Mafamaticks
    Mar 29, 11:34 AM
    Windows phone may (and I'm being generous) top iPhone only due to the foundation that Nokia laid for them. I don't know about the quality of the Nokia hardware overseas, but it must be decent for Symbian to hold a nice chunk of market share for so long.

    Windows and Nokia better put their heads together to come up with some software though. Last I read about Windows Phone 7 was that they didn't include copy and paste, essentially trying to mimic iPhone features.





    gugy
    Aug 28, 01:29 PM
    I do agree that the look of the current enclosure is great, and it's doubtful we'll get a change to the look of the enclosure anytime soon. However, I can see them changing the enclosure to match up more with what the regular MB allows, i.e. easy access to the HDD bay so users can swap out hard drives ease. Now that would be nice.


    sure, I agree that minimal changes might happen. If it improves the experience, why not.
    A total redesign case is what I doubt. It will take some time. I would say at least 1 year from now.
    Same for the entire line up. Imac, MacPro, laptops, Mac Mini, displays, etc. Apple's current hardware design is very nice. Besides minor improvements, big changes will take some time IMHO.





    MagnusVonMagnum
    Apr 16, 11:21 AM
    God forbid you carry around an inch long adapter in your laptop bag. Is that too much for you?


    You keep talking about a non-existent adapter that costs $10 and comparing mini-display port adapters that merely convert signal paths isn't even in the same realm as converting to an entirely different interface. In other words your 'adapter' prices are 100% BS and you know it.


    LOL, are you kidding me bro? Do you think USB 3 peaks out at it's max 5 Gbps? YOU are the one dreaming if you believe that. Here's some more evidence for your FUD:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCz_c_rDAXw

    USB 3 would completely choke in that situation let alone in a simply hard drive speed comparison. Give me a break. Here's another example for you to look at for some REAL WORLD USB 3 speeds:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrtwtSjzjZI


    Don't tase me bro! :eek:

    Seriously, you going to compare a demonstration with a professional mass storage array that isn't available to the public yet and which I said at the bottom of my last post is a perfect use for TB (i.e. with professional editing software) with the Lacie consumer grade 5200 RPM SLOW USB3 drive? Dude, you have to compare apples to apples. You're comparing a race car to a Chevette.... That neither proves nor disproves anything about the full capability of USB3. The ad on that box is marketing BS about the "interface" not the drive they're selling (which is a slow 5200 RPM SATA drive which all top out between 40-60MB/sec PERIOD, regardless whether they use SATA, USB3, Firewire 800 or Thunderbolt). Show me a 7200 RPM (or better yet a 10,000+ SCSI rated) drive connected to USB3 AND TB (or even FW800) and then compare their actual speeds. OR find an array that goes fast like the one Intel was using that also has USB3 on it and compare their actual speeds 1 to 1. Showing me Steak Diane on one plate and a hot dog on the other doesn't prove the cook who made the hot dog doesn't know how to cook. It simply proves he was given a hot dog to cook.



    In reality with USB 3 you get about 480 Megabits as opposed to the promised 5 Gpbs meaning Thunderbolt will be even faster than two times.


    In reality, you need an actual hard drive test that makes sense not comparing a Porsche to a lawn tractor.... :rolleyes:


    So you are just ASSUMING that they will cost $250 more than USB 3 drives.


    No more than you assuming you're going to get a $10 USB3 adapter. At least my assumption is based on Firewire statistics and early adoption rates. Yours is based on dreaming.


    LOL, words can't describe how wrong you are. You think HDD speeds cap out at 480 Mbps? Maybe in your 'practical world' where you enjoy using inferior


    I think the 5200 RPM 2.5" drive that came with my MBP capped out around 50MB/sec using a SATA II interface (or 450mbps). Does that prove my SATA chip set SUCKS? NO, IT DOES NOT. When I replaced it with a 7200 RPM Hitachi, it now caps out around 110MB/sec (or 880mbps, well above FW800's theoretical cap even). Even my PPC G4 gets 105MB/sec caps with its 1.5TB 7200 RPM Seagate Barracuda drives (and SATA does eat CPU as well; if I try to run two of them at the same time I still get a total of around 100MB/sec with the CPU pegged at 95-100%. The older PCI bus is also in the way. Thus it's not the SATA interface there that's the problem either, but you might think so if you make assumptions based only on one test number and no idea what's in the computer being used or any statistics about the CPU or Bus while its being used. Your YouTube videos comparisons are absurd in that regard. Cheap mass storage devices (like the Lacie) aren't made for performance. Show me TB making that same drive do over 100MB/sec. It won't happen.


    Your 'practical world' when you were just talking about how no one will pay a premium for USB 3.


    I never said any such thing. I said they won't pay a premium for Thunderbolt for every-day use. If you're just going to lie and change what I said, I won't bother replying anymore.

    USB 3 won't be a premium over anything. It's going to be dirt cheap and a simple performance upgrade for everyone. It already is cheap for new computers and a pretty cheap add-on for existing ones; you cannot add TB to existing computers so there's another problem it has to contend with, especially trying to get a large user base in any reasonable length of time. The longer it takes to get a large installed user base, the longer the prices will stay high on any TB products. It's plainly obvious that TB is going to be a high-end niche product just like FW800, at least for the forseeable future. While Intel's demo is totally cool, it doesn't remotely represent the AVERAGE PC user in any shape or form. Most people aren't editing 4 simultaneous streams of 1080p video on a mega-buck professional high-speed drive array.

    I have NO problem with TB technology or its usefulness in certain applications. I do contend that most people aren't going to give a crap about it one way or the other since their computers will not have it or need it for their everyday uses. More to the point, most computers (save maybe those from Apple) will have ALSO have USB3, allowing the user to make the best possible choices for their needs. USB3 will not fail or go away simply because it is a cheap upgrade to USB2 that is fully backwards compatible. Computers will have it just for that reason alone even if the user doesn't make good use of it.

    IF TB ever achieves mass acceptance, it will be years into the future. It takes time to build a user base on a totally new technology. USB3 is a simple dump and replace and still works with everything USB2. TB works with NOTHING that already exists (save a few Mini-display port monitors and that's only because it carries Mini-display port video signals). The fact that Intel plans to do USB3 alongside TB on their next chipset shows even they understand that TB is going to be high-end/niche product for some time to come.

    I have said in the past that IF Intel had used the USB3 style connector and essentially had USB compatibility + MORE bandwidth THEN they might start appearing on everything. But they chose instead to use a connector that is hardly on anything (but newer Macs) and that isn't much different than starting over with a totally new connector and no compatibility with anything (outside breakout boxes that are essentially PCI cards in a box). When it comes down to it, TB is basically the entire PCIe bus on a single external connector.





    Blue Fox
    Nov 14, 12:09 AM
    I'm not going to defend Apple because NO BODY on this forum knows the exact circumstances of the situation.

    I'm not going to defend Rogue Amoeba because NO BODY on this forum knows the exact circumstances of the situation.

    No body knows ****** about either side of the story, yet there are 5 pages of arguments between people saying they know exactly what happened because they read an article that had a quote by someone, and somehow that means that's EXACTLY what happened. Ignorance.

    But that's arguing on the internet for you. Pointless.





    fowler.
    Mar 23, 05:06 PM
    DUI checkpoints are basically "anything illegal" checkpoints these days. They check for insurance, suspended licenses, etc. This information should be available to anyone, in any form, as long as the law says it's legal.





    Gasu E.
    Apr 22, 08:34 AM
    I'm amazed that no-one is seeing the very dangerous path we could be heading down here. Will people only see it when it's too late?

    Are we looking into the jaws of the future where you pay, but never OWN anything? Music, Movies, Apps.

    You pay to have the right to listen/watch/use the data.

    The data is never downloaded to your device to do as you wish, it's always held by the owners. or distributors.

    I can see this coming like a flashing red warning sign.

    You never OWNED any of this stuff. You owned the physical media, and you had an unlimited license to you. The technology is just clarifying this.

    If you had actually owned it, you could have copied it as much as you wanted-- legally-- and resold the copies to others. You have been capable of doing this, but it was illegal; it also was difficult to enforce the law. Now the technology is actually starting to match your legal rights. It's actually wonderful. You are not losing anything you had legally, but the true owners (the content creators and the people who support them financially) can stop getting ripped off by criminals.